Search

Content Details

Tunisian Court Issues Harsh Prison Sentences Against Ghannouchi and Prominent Opposition Figures

Tunisian Court Issues Harsh Prison Sentences Against Ghannouchi and Prominent Opposition Figures

 

On Tuesday, the Tunis Primary Court issued severe sentences in the "Conspiracy 2" case, ranging from 12 to 35 years in prison, with immediate enforcement for defendants residing abroad. The court also ruled to dismiss charges against one of the accused.

The court sentenced the head of the Ennahda Movement, Professor Rached Ghannouchi, to 14 years in prison, despite his refusal to appear before the court and his continued boycott of the trials since his arrest in April 2023.

Ghannouchi has previously received multiple sentences in cases that international human rights organizations have described as “politically motivated.”

The court also sentenced each of Mahrez Zouari, Abdelkarim Oueididi, senior Ennahda figure Habib Ellouze, and former mayor of Zahra, Rayan Hamzaoui, to 12 years in prison.

In absentia, the court sentenced to 35 years in prison with immediate enforcement: former presidential chief of staff Nadia Akacha; Moaz Ghannouchi, son of the movement's leader; Adel Daddaa; Rafik Abdessalem; Lotfi Zitoun; and journalist Maher Zaid.

The verdicts included subjecting all those convicted to five years of administrative surveillance. The charges relate to “forming and joining a terrorist group, using Tunisian territory to commit terrorist crimes, recruiting and training individuals, and spreading information that threatens national security.”

Meanwhile, former Prime Minister Youssef Chahed remains outside the scope of the trial, after appealing the decision to refer him to the criminal court.

These rulings come months after verdicts were issued in the "Conspiracy 1" case against other prominent political figures, including Kamel Ltaief (66), Khayam Turki (48), and Noureddine Bhiri (43), among others.

Ghannouchi’s defense team stated that the verdict was delivered “remotely,” and that their client refused to participate due to the “absence of fair trial standards,” noting that the rest of the defendants were “prevented from attending and defending themselves.”

The team added that the accusations were based on a “false report from an anonymous secret witness,” considering the proceedings a “political trial aimed at eliminating opponents of Kais Saied’s regime” since July 25, 2021.

They affirmed their continued legal and human rights battle in defense of Ghannouchi’s freedom and the right to a fair trial that upholds the law and presumption of innocence.

(Source: Agencies)

 

ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ

* للاطلاع على الترجمة الكاملة للخبر باللغة العربية، اضغط (هنا).


Tags:


Attachments:

بعد
Coordination between the Imams Committee of the Union and the Mufti of Bursa to Host the International Scientific Forum for Imams Next August

Search

Latest Tweets

Latest Posts

Branches